Choose GST-800 for tighter access and compact flail work
GST-800 is the better fit when orchard rows, vineyard lines, narrower passages and controlled rough-grass work still reward a more compact tracked flail mower.
This compare guide is for buyers choosing between a compact 800 mm tracked flail mower and the main 1000 mm standard-flail balance point for orchard rows, rough grass, field edges, maintained slopes and daily vegetation control.
GST-800 is the better fit when orchard rows, vineyard lines, narrower passages and controlled rough-grass work still reward a more compact tracked flail mower.
GST-1000 is the better fit when broader daily coverage, heavier routine vegetation control and the main 1000 mm standard-flail setup matter more than compact width.
| Comparison point | GST-800 | GST-1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Machine role | Compact standard hybrid remote-controlled tracked flail mower | Core standard hybrid remote-controlled tracked flail mower |
| Cutting width | 800 mm | 1000 mm |
| Engine options | Gasoline 459 (16HP) / Diesel 192F (12HP) | Gasoline 459 (16HP) / Diesel 192F (12HP) |
| Battery system | 2 × 12V 20Ah batteries in series (24V system) | 2 × 12V 20Ah batteries in series (24V system) |
| Net weight | 338 kg | 346 kg |
| Control system | C7 standard / industrial remote optional | C7 standard / industrial remote optional |
| Lift system | Manual standard / hydraulic remote optional | Manual standard / hydraulic remote optional |
| Best fit | Tighter access, orchard rows and narrower rough-grass work | Broader orchard work and heavier routine vegetation control |
The engine is not the main decision here. The real question is whether the job still needs compact flail access or already calls for the broader 1000 mm standard machine for heavier routine work.
The 800 mm version makes more sense where orchard rows, vineyard lines and narrow work zones still define how the machine can be used.
The 1000 mm version makes more sense once the site can accept more width and the buyer wants the main standard-flail balance point.
Still strong for rough grass and compact flail work, but naturally lighter on pass width and daily coverage.
Better when the operator wants a stronger standard-flail routine with fewer passes and broader daily area coverage.
Keeps the same gasoline and diesel options while preserving a more compact flail footprint.
Keeps the same gasoline and diesel options but turns it into the more central 1000 mm machine for broader professional use.
Best when stepping up from mower limits into flail cutting without immediately choosing the larger core machine.
Best when the buyer already knows the compact option is no longer enough and wants the main standard-family balance point.
After the comparison, the next step should be obvious: open the family page, review the right product page, request guidance or check support information.
Because the main difference is not the engine. It is the machine role: compact 800 mm access versus the broader 1000 mm standard-flail balance point for daily work.
Stay with GST-800 when tighter access, narrower work zones and a more compact tracked flail mower still matter more than the extra width of GST-1000.
Move to GST-1000 when broader daily coverage, heavier routine vegetation control and the main standard-flail decision point matter more than compact width.
Yes. The comparison ends with a clear next step, such as opening the product page, asking for advice or contacting a dealer.